<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Audience feedback for &#8216;Ran&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.chelmsford-filmclub.co.uk/2016/11/08/audience-feedback-for-ran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.chelmsford-filmclub.co.uk/2016/11/08/audience-feedback-for-ran/</link>
	<description>An independent film society based in Chelmsford, Essex.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2016 14:11:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Simon L		</title>
		<link>https://www.chelmsford-filmclub.co.uk/2016/11/08/audience-feedback-for-ran/#comment-1133</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 13:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.chelmsford-filmclub.co.uk/?p=3290#comment-1133</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m afraid Ran for me was only a &#039;nearly ran&#039;. Great scenery, sets, cast numbers and strong association with Shakespeare doesn&#039;t mean an automatic classic. I actually thought the acting was only average and the story more long-winded than needed to be. I think it needed better editing. 

Rating: Satisfactory]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m afraid Ran for me was only a &#8216;nearly ran&#8217;. Great scenery, sets, cast numbers and strong association with Shakespeare doesn&#8217;t mean an automatic classic. I actually thought the acting was only average and the story more long-winded than needed to be. I think it needed better editing. </p>
<p>Rating: Satisfactory</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
